Project & Programme Management

Results are designed in, not reported afterwards.

PRASOL helps programme teams design, deliver and prove results. We connect design, funding, monitoring, evaluation and learning, so that your programmes deliver what they promise and show it to funders.

Book a project systems review Take the free self-assessment
Since 2005
Years of Regional Impact
100%
Funder Standard Rigour
10+
Countries Reached

Most projects do not fail at closure. They fail at design.

Weak problem analysis, untested assumptions and vague indicators are built in at the start. They surface years later as poor evaluation findings and lost funding. Development budgets are shrinking, and funders now fund organizations that can prove results.

Strong programmes rest on a clear theory of change, a measurable results framework, a working MEAL system and independent evidence of what changed.

Field Survey

Civil society organizations

Winning competitive funding, meeting donor compliance and showing results that justify renewal.

International NGOs and partners

Independent evaluations, partner capacity assessments and technical backstopping for implementing partners.

Public institutions and counties

Designing and managing donor-funded and government programmes, joint work planning and results-based reporting.

Our approach

From design to evidence

The PRASOL Programme Cycle runs on five steps. Each step has an owner and a measurable output.

  1. Design

    Analyse the problem, stakeholders and context. Build the theory of change and logical framework.

    Output: a fundable concept note
  2. Plan

    Set scope, work plans, budgets, risks and stakeholder engagement.

    Output: inception report
  3. Deliver

    Implement against plans with sound coordination, risk management and partner management.

    Output: on-time, on-budget activities
  4. Measure

    Track indicators through a MEAL system, from baseline to mid-term review.

    Output: monitoring reports & data
  5. Learn

    Evaluate outcomes and impact, document lessons and feed them into the next design.

    Output: evaluation & learning

Each evaluation feeds the next design. Funders see an organization that learns and improves.

Support across the whole programme portfolio

We don't just hand you a report. We act as partners in building the systems that allow you to win funding, deliver on time, and prove your impact to donors.

Strategy Presentation

Design and funding

Concept notes, full proposals, proposal reviews and organizational capability statements.

Systems

Results frameworks, MEAL systems, indicator reference sheets, data collection tools and digital dashboards.

Delivery

Work planning, risk management, stakeholder engagement and communication plans.

Evidence

Baseline surveys, mid-term reviews, final evaluations, impact assessments, third-party monitoring and verification.

Portfolio and partners

Portfolio management advice, partner capacity assessments and technical backstopping.

Services

Services that match where you are

Start with a systems review, strengthen design and measurement, then sustain delivery with backstopping.

Project systems review

Assessment of design, MEAL, risk, compliance and reporting practices, ending in a prioritized improvement plan.

2–3 weeks

Concept note and proposal development

Problem analysis, theory of change, logframe, work plan and budget narrative aligned to the funder's template.

2–4 weeks per proposal

Organizational capability statement

A profile of your mandate, systems, track record and team for proposals and due diligence.

1–2 weeks

MEAL system development

Results framework, indicator reference sheets, data tools, reporting templates and dashboard.

4–8 weeks

Baseline studies

Baseline values and targets for every outcome indicator, using mixed methods.

4–6 weeks

Evaluations and impact assessments

Mid-term, final and impact evaluations against OECD-DAC criteria, with actionable recommendations.

6–12 weeks

Third-party monitoring and verification

Independent verification of beneficiaries, outputs and delivery in hard-to-reach areas.

Per monitoring cycle

Technical backstopping

Ongoing advice on implementation, reporting and compliance for programme teams and partners.

Monthly or quarterly retainer

Professional training

Professional Certificate in Project Cycle Management, proposal writing, M&E and report writing.

In-house or open enrolment
All assignments are priced on a fixed-fee or retainer basis, agreed before work starts. We do not take commissions on funds raised.

Who we work with

We partner with organizations across the non-profit, public, and international development sectors.

Workshop Training

Civil society

NGOs, community-based organizations and networks seeking competitive and direct funding.

Typical starting point: project systems review

International NGOs

Agencies commissioning independent evaluations, partner assessments and learning events.

Typical starting point: evaluation or baseline study

Public institutions

Ministries, county governments and commissions managing donor-funded and government programmes.

Typical starting point: MEAL system development

Track record

Selected programme assignments:

  • End-term Evaluation of the Support to Electoral Processes in Kenya (SEPK) Project, UNDP Kenya.
  • Summative Evaluation of the IGAD Centre of Excellence for Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Programme, seven IGAD member states, Tanzania and Rwanda.
  • External Evaluation of the UN Joint Programme on Local Governance, Somalia.
  • Joint Work Planning Manual and learning events for development partners and nine counties in Northern, North Eastern and South Eastern Kenya.
  • Final evaluations for Oxfam Novib, Hope Worldwide Kenya and Women Political Alliance-Kenya; mid-term evaluations for Solidarités International and Transparency International Kenya.
  • Technical backstopping of EC-funded projects for Caritas Switzerland and Somali Women's Agenda, Somalia.

Why PRASOL

Evaluator perspective

We have evaluated programmes for UN agencies, IGAD and international NGOs. We design with the evaluation in mind.

Fragile and hard-to-reach contexts

Proven delivery in Somalia, northern Kenya and cross-border areas, with local enumerators and remote verification methods.

Funder standards

Proposals, MEAL systems and evaluations follow OECD-DAC criteria and results-based management standards.

Evidence that informs decisions

Every report ends with clear, prioritized recommendations that management can act on.

Free self-assessment

How strong are your project systems? Find out in three minutes.

Answer ten questions to see where your project management system stands and which step to take next. Your answers stay in your browser.

0 of 10 answered

Start with a project systems review

Tell us about your programmes and funders. We will propose a scope, timeline and fixed fee within five working days.

Book a project systems review
Opens WhatsApp — we usually reply within one working day.

View our Professional Certificate in Project Cycle Management →